<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Flightdeck Friday &#8211; Curtiss XF14C-2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/03/09/flightdeck-friday-curtiss-xf14c-2/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/03/09/flightdeck-friday-curtiss-xf14c-2</link>
	<description>Notes and commentary on things present, reflections on a career in naval aviation and serendipitous items as strike me at the moment...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:01:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Flightdeck Friday: The F6F-3/-5 h***cat - Scourge of the Pacific</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/03/09/flightdeck-friday-curtiss-xf14c-2/comment-page-1#comment-2361</link>
		<dc:creator>Flightdeck Friday: The F6F-3/-5 h***cat - Scourge of the Pacific</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 03:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/03/09/flightdeck-friday-curtiss-xf14c-2/#comment-2361</guid>
		<description>[...] alone in this endeavor - over at Vought, the XF4U-1 was taking form and Curtiss was busy with the XF14C.  Of the three, the Navy favored the XF4U which seemed to be further along than the others.  As [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] alone in this endeavor &#8211; over at Vought, the XF4U-1 was taking form and Curtiss was busy with the XF14C.  Of the three, the Navy favored the XF4U which seemed to be further along than the others.  As [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
