<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on the New Maritime Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy</link>
	<description>Notes and commentary on things present, reflections on a career in naval aviation and serendipitous items as strike me at the moment...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 02:09:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ‘A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower’ Two Years Later: Three Questions &#124; Steeljaw Scribe</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-4505</link>
		<dc:creator>‘A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower’ Two Years Later: Three Questions &#124; Steeljaw Scribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:13:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/#comment-4505</guid>
		<description>[...] and budgeting if – IF it does not become fodder for collecting dust on a shelf someplace.” (steeljawscribe.com [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and budgeting if – IF it does not become fodder for collecting dust on a shelf someplace.” (steeljawscribe.com [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naval Operations Concept (NOC) To Be Released Oct 08 &#124; Steeljaw Scribe</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-2954</link>
		<dc:creator>Naval Operations Concept (NOC) To Be Released Oct 08 &#124; Steeljaw Scribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 10:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/#comment-2954</guid>
		<description>[...] disussed the NOC and its role  &#160;before on these pages and while we feel it is about 8 months late &#160;, we nevertheless recall the birthing pains from our own experiences  &#160;and look forward [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] disussed the NOC and its role  &nbsp;before on these pages and while we feel it is about 8 months late &nbsp;, we nevertheless recall the birthing pains from our own experiences  &nbsp;and look forward [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thoughts on the Maritime Strategy: Round II</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-1649</link>
		<dc:creator>Thoughts on the Maritime Strategy: Round II</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 20:58:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/#comment-1649</guid>
		<description>[...] goals of the strategy. Much has already been written already on this particular subject including on these pages when the MS first came out. Rather than rehash the points made then and elsewhere, including Work [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] goals of the strategy. Much has already been written already on this particular subject including on these pages when the MS first came out. Rather than rehash the points made then and elsewhere, including Work [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeljaw Scribe »</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Steeljaw Scribe »</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 19:20:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/#comment-909</guid>
		<description>[...] vindication comes quietly &#8211; as, say, a couple of years later in part of an interview and provides [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] vindication comes quietly &ndash; as, say, a couple of years later in part of an interview and provides [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strategy1</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/comment-page-1#comment-655</link>
		<dc:creator>Strategy1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 14:56:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/2007/10/28/thoughts-on-the-new-maritime-strategy/#comment-655</guid>
		<description>http://thegate.nationaljournal.com/2007/10/navy_looks_beyond_wars_in_new_1.php

http://www.forbes.com/home/business/2007/10/25/iraq-naval-strategy-cx-1026oxford.html

http://www.pentagonchannel.com

SJS---great summary, though I&#039;m sure we will continue to agree to disagree.  I am proud of having been a part of this dialogue, as your readers are articulate, concerned, and smart.  Would that I had them all to work with!  Keep in mind though, that I did have really smart people to work with, and that the strategy you see went through multiple, world-wide staffing processes.  It isn&#039;t a bunch of guys sitting around the table...it is the now agreed upon direction the Sea Services will take--signed off very enthusiastically by the Chiefs of those Services.

I have included a few links above by way of signing off (and returning to my day job, as SJS says).  The first two are reactions from outside the family--again, a group far more enthusiastic to the strategy than those within.

The third is a link to the Pentagon Channel. Click the link to &quot;This Week in Washington&quot; and you&#039;ll find a show aimed at a very general audience.  At about 14 minutes, I get interviewed for a bit.  40 minutes of interview boiled down to about 5, but it isn&#039;t a bad bit of editing.  

Great forum here, keep up the good work, everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://thegate.nationaljournal.com/2007/10/navy_looks_beyond_wars_in_new_1.php" rel="nofollow">http://thegate.nationaljournal.com/2007/10/navy_looks_beyond_wars_in_new_1.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.forbes.com/home/business/2007/10/25/iraq-naval-strategy-cx-1026oxford.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.forbes.com/home/business/2007/10/25/iraq-naval-strategy-cx-1026oxford.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.pentagonchannel.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.pentagonchannel.com</a></p>
<p>SJS&#8212;great summary, though I&#8217;m sure we will continue to agree to disagree.  I am proud of having been a part of this dialogue, as your readers are articulate, concerned, and smart.  Would that I had them all to work with!  Keep in mind though, that I did have really smart people to work with, and that the strategy you see went through multiple, world-wide staffing processes.  It isn&#8217;t a bunch of guys sitting around the table&#8230;it is the now agreed upon direction the Sea Services will take&#8211;signed off very enthusiastically by the Chiefs of those Services.</p>
<p>I have included a few links above by way of signing off (and returning to my day job, as SJS says).  The first two are reactions from outside the family&#8211;again, a group far more enthusiastic to the strategy than those within.</p>
<p>The third is a link to the Pentagon Channel. Click the link to &#8220;This Week in Washington&#8221; and you&#8217;ll find a show aimed at a very general audience.  At about 14 minutes, I get interviewed for a bit.  40 minutes of interview boiled down to about 5, but it isn&#8217;t a bad bit of editing.  </p>
<p>Great forum here, keep up the good work, everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
