<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: F-35 Slated for Common Electronic Attack Platform?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steeljawscribe.com/2008/12/01/f-35-slated-for-common-electronic-attack-platform/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2008/12/01/f-35-slated-for-common-electronic-attack-platform</link>
	<description>Looking for clues at the scene of the crime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 May 2012 13:46:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steeljawscribe</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2008/12/01/f-35-slated-for-common-electronic-attack-platform/comment-page-1#comment-3823</link>
		<dc:creator>Steeljawscribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 16:53:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/?p=1788#comment-3823</guid>
		<description>I guess my point is that if we are going to such extent to automate the system, it seems to be not that great a leap to place it aboard a UAV which provides some opportunities not available with a manned EF-35 (jeez, where the h3ll are they going to stuff all this in an EF-35B for pity&#039;s sake?).  It wouldn&#039;t necessarily need to link back for control so much as to report what it (a) has found and (b) is doing about it.

Sid: On the tanker *nothing* is radiating (or at least is not supposed to...)  I know the AF tankers in particular get very jumpy about making sure everything is cold before closing in to plug-in.
- SJS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess my point is that if we are going to such extent to automate the system, it seems to be not that great a leap to place it aboard a UAV which provides some opportunities not available with a manned EF-35 (jeez, where the h3ll are they going to stuff all this in an EF-35B for pity&#8217;s sake?).  It wouldn&#8217;t necessarily need to link back for control so much as to report what it (a) has found and (b) is doing about it.</p>
<p>Sid: On the tanker *nothing* is radiating (or at least is not supposed to&#8230;)  I know the AF tankers in particular get very jumpy about making sure everything is cold before closing in to plug-in.<br />
- SJS
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://steeljawscribe.com/wordpress/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',3823)" src="http://steeljawscribe.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-3823">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sid</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2008/12/01/f-35-slated-for-common-electronic-attack-platform/comment-page-1#comment-3821</link>
		<dc:creator>sid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 13:55:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/?p=1788#comment-3821</guid>
		<description>How does all this extra power consumption...and the extra APU to generate it...impact fuel consumption?

Will this puppy be able to radiate when its on the tanker?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How does all this extra power consumption&#8230;and the extra APU to generate it&#8230;impact fuel consumption?</p>
<p>Will this puppy be able to radiate when its on the tanker?
<p class="comment-like"><img class="comment-like-btn" title="Vote" onclick="cl_like_this('http://steeljawscribe.com/wordpress/wp-admin/admin-ajax.php',3821)" src="http://steeljawscribe.com/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/comments-likes/images/like.png" />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<span id="comment-like-cnt-3821">0</span> likes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

