<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Thoughts on &#8216;A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower&#8217; Two Year&#8217;s Later: Author&#8217;s Response</title>
	<atom:link href="http://steeljawscribe.com/2009/10/21/thoughts-on-a-cooperative-strategy-for-21st-century-seapower-two-years-later-authors-response/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2009/10/21/thoughts-on-a-cooperative-strategy-for-21st-century-seapower-two-years-later-authors-response</link>
	<description>Looking for clues at the scene of the crime</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 01:55:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Posts about Forbearance as of October 22, 2009</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2009/10/21/thoughts-on-a-cooperative-strategy-for-21st-century-seapower-two-years-later-authors-response/comment-page-1#comment-4588</link>
		<dc:creator>Posts about Forbearance as of October 22, 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 13:14:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/?p=3692#comment-4588</guid>
		<description>[...] loan make it impossible for you to continue making the payments, thus risking losing your home.   Thoughts on ‘A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower’ Two Year’s Later: Author’s Re... &#8211; steeljawscribe.com 10/22/2009 Bryan McGrath, lead author of CS21 (as it is coming to be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] loan make it impossible for you to continue making the payments, thus risking losing your home.   Thoughts on ‘A Cooperative Strategy for 21st Century Seapower’ Two Year’s Later: Author’s Re&#8230; &#8211; steeljawscribe.com 10/22/2009 Bryan McGrath, lead author of CS21 (as it is coming to be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: B.Smitty</title>
		<link>http://steeljawscribe.com/2009/10/21/thoughts-on-a-cooperative-strategy-for-21st-century-seapower-two-years-later-authors-response/comment-page-1#comment-4517</link>
		<dc:creator>B.Smitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://steeljawscribe.com/?p=3692#comment-4517</guid>
		<description>Makes sense.  The OPC (as spec&#039;d) won&#039;t be a slouch here either (9000nm at economical speeds, 45 days endurance, 11m &amp; 7m RHIB, helo and VTUAV support).  

My thought was, since it isn&#039;t out of the design phase, they Navy could work a deal to impose some NVRs, maybe improve quieting with a diesel-electric plant and make other modifications to the design, with the understanding that a larger USCG/USN buy will reduce prices for both.  

And since it&#039;s smaller than the NSC, you might be able to buy 6-7 for the price of 4 LCS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense.  The OPC (as spec&#8217;d) won&#8217;t be a slouch here either (9000nm at economical speeds, 45 days endurance, 11m &amp; 7m RHIB, helo and VTUAV support).  </p>
<p>My thought was, since it isn&#8217;t out of the design phase, they Navy could work a deal to impose some NVRs, maybe improve quieting with a diesel-electric plant and make other modifications to the design, with the understanding that a larger USCG/USN buy will reduce prices for both.  </p>
<p>And since it&#8217;s smaller than the NSC, you might be able to buy 6-7 for the price of 4 LCS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

