DoD Official: “China Pursues U.S. Military Ties More Slowly Than Hoped”

File this one under "and you were expecting maybe something different?"

Outgoing DepSecDef for Asia & Pacific Affairs, Richard Lawless remarked upon the glacial pace of mil-to-mil contacts with the Chinese military during a final press conference late last month.  During the course of that press conference he highlighted several concerns, noting that a continued lack of transparency perforce, compells one to assume the worst case scenario in the face of the ongoing modernization and build-up of Chinese military forces.

Ahem. You think???

"They have been more willing to engage, but it is engagement by millimeters and increments," Richard Lawless told reporters July 6 during a media roundtable. He retired June 30 from his position as deputy assistant secretary for Asian and Pacific affairs.   Of particular concern, he said, is China’s failure to accept U.S. offers to engage in nuclear policy talks.   "The offer has been on the table for well over a year and a half for them to engage in a discussion about their strategic nuclear forces," he said. "This is a big deal. And it is a particularly big deal when you see the pace of deployment and the pace of development and where we are going to be in just three or four years."   Despite U.S. urging to discuss these developments now, before China deploys its new systems, "to date, that interest on our part has met with pretty much silence," Lawless said.

Hellooo, McFly….

He noted that the United States pulled out all stops for a top Chinese naval officer who visited, providing him "unprecedented access to everything that he asked for." Yet when arrangements were being made for Navy Adm. Mike Mullen, chief of naval operations, to visit China, "nowhere near that same level of reciprocity was being discussed or offered," he said.  "So I guess the key word here is ‘disappointment,’" Lawless said. "What we expect the Chinese to do is give us the same level of access that we give them here in the United States. … And if that cannot be reciprocated, then we have a very serious disconnect."  Visits aren’t the end-all in a bilateral military relationship, Lawless conceded. "But the visits are an important meter stick or indicator of what this relationship is and what it is not, and it also shows us where we need to go with the relationship," he said. "And we have a long way to go to get where we want to be."

 

Of course, one could argue why should China bother when the West is so busy giving away the store

 

 

 

Similar Posts

One Comment

  1. China’s pursuing a old-school balance-of-power strategy. Good for us is that they need access to the U.S. market to fuel their growth. Their imediate concern in many respects is Moscow, another autocratic regime renouncing international institutionalism for traditional realpolitik. The U.S. would be well to maintain preparedness against the both of them.

    Have a great weekend!

Comments are closed.