After ten years in overhaul/upgrades (Sevmash and Rossiiskaya Gazeta ) – meet the “Dmitriy Donskoy”(“Дмитрий Донской”), a Project 941 class SSBN:

It is probably worth noting this is the same shipyard that is responsible for the ongoing overhaul of the INS Vikramaditya (neè Adm Gorshvov) carrier for the Indian Navy – which is also well behind schedule and considerably over budget.  The root of these problems lies in the design practices of the Soviet-era navy.  To wit, the ships were designed with about a 20 year lifespan in mind and without consideration for upgrades.  When upgrades are installed it is often a prolonged process, especially where cabling and electronics are concerned.  Those who have had opportunity to compare notes with their Russian counterparts have noted the surprise of the Russians upon seeing a 20+ year old ship with a brand new electronics suite, or some other new fitment.

So if the Dimitriy Donskoy was already around as one of the existent Typhoon-SSBN’s why spend ten years in modifications?  It was the direct reslt of being IDd as the test platform for the new Bulava SLBM, while the Yuri Dolgoruky, which also has seen its fair share of construction delays, will be the lead sub of a new class of SSBNs that will carry the Bulava.  All of this presupposes the Bulava can get out of the development stage without further failures.

Which, it would seem, is a bit of a challenge.  Originally conceived with the idea of using as much of the Topol-M land-mobile ICBM, it in fact is a new missile (shorter/wider) than the Topol-M in order to fit SSBNs:

Development of the Bulava missile began in 1999. Originally a different new solid-propellant missile was developed (the “Bark”)that would fit in the existing R-39 missile tubes of the Typhoon-class submarines. The keel of the first Project 955 submarine, the Yuri Dolgoruky, was laid down at the Severodvinsk Nuclear Shipbuilding Centre in Arkhangelsk in 1996, and was to have entered service in 2001, replacing earlier Project 941 Typhoon-class ballistic missile submarines equipped with R-39 missiles. However the new solid-propellant ballistic missile failed in all three of its initial development tests in the late 1990’s. That missile was cancelled and the Moscow Heat Engineering Institute was ordered to develop a new missile, the Bulava, in its place. The Yuri Dolgoruky, already in construction, had to be redesigned. The Typhoon-class SSBN selected for testing the Bulava, the Dmitry Donskoi, had to be heavily modified to Project 941UM standard. All of this resulted in the first test of the new missile being delayed to 2005, over seven years late to the original schedule.(astronautix.com)

 

With a dismal success rate (4 failures in the first six launches and the last, in November 2007, was also a failure) there is concern over the ability of this non-traditional (for missile development/production) institute’s ability to build a functional, reliable weapon.  According to Pavel’s site, it looks like they are going to try again, sometime very soon (Sept/Oct timeframe).  A vote of confidence, per se, was allocated MHHI back in July 2007 with a decision to continue development and production of the Bulava.  Whether that was merited or not presumably lies in the next series of tests.

 

Update:  Survey says — successful shot.

 

5 Comments

  1. Byron Audler

    Hey, Scribe, did you hear that SAP, Charles Berleman is getting married, the lucky dog? I got my invitation yesterday, but sadly do not think I’ll make it as we are about as far apart as you can get, Jacksonville and Wash. St. Chuck is a friend of mine from years back when we both were serious Harpoon players, and I first met him along with a Marine Major friend up in Norfolk. I’m really pulling for him to get Chief in a year or two, I really wish he’d gone OCS, he’s a damn smart young man, and I wish him the best.

  2. claudio

    Ia dumaiu shto, Bulava, i Yuri Dolgoruki ne ochen harasho. pa moemu = govno. poka!

    no, eta ochen bolshaia podvodaniya lodka!. OCHEN.

  3. SJS:
    Do ya think there might be a bit of Russian disinformation going on here. I’m not so sure the Bulava works, it has been a failure too many times to suddenly work on Putin’s new” Russia’s POWERFUL schedule…..”I’d say BULLSHITSKI” except I’m a gentleman. I’m waiting for the Peter the Great to get towed back to port by the seagoing tug that follows her around…..or, better yet, she’ll be quickly and expertly repaired by Chavez’s naval forces…..
    Tincanman

  4. Steeljawscribe

    According to Defense Ministry officials (unnamed) (h/t Pavel), it appears that while launch and fly-out were successful, separation of the RVs from the bus wasn’t. Now, especially iven the history of the Bulava, would the test be considered a failure, a success or partial success/failure? If the intent was an end-to-end test, I would assert it was a failure – heaven knows, if it was a US test, the press would be all over it as a failure vice a ‘partial success.’ Puts the Russians in a bit of quandry as it appears they will be pressing ahead with IOC on the Yuri Dolgoruky, designed to carry the Bulava in the next several months and an alternative SLBM isn’t an option.
    -SJS

Trackbacks for this post

  1. Красная звезда вторник: Red Star Tuesday | Steeljaw Scribe

Comments are closed.

Bad Behavior has blocked 4120 access attempts in the last 7 days.