Hammer Time

No, not this one – more like this

Item: Navy ship $840 million over budget and still unfinished (h/t Phibian) — The highly touted  nerve center of the new, $1.8 billion amphibious ship San Antonio is fraught with computer hardware crashes that could cripple operations.  The ship lacks basic safety equipment, such as hand rails and reliable guns to battle close-in attacks.  In all, Navy inspectors found 30 major flaws aboard the San Antonio, according to an internal report obtained by The Virginian-Pilot. Despite the deficiencies, the Navy has earmarked $13 billion to purchase nine amphibious ships in the San Antonio class.

Item:  LM Must Fix JASSM This Month —  Lockheed Martin has until the end of June to negotiate a get-well plan with the U.S. Air Force for its $5.8 billion stealthy cruise missile program or face full termination.

Item:  Showdown Ends in Cancellation U.S. Navy Scraps LCS 3 After Dispute With Lockheed The decision capped a month of negotiations in which the Navy sought to change the contract for LCS 3, the second Lockheed ship, from a cost-plus to a fixed-cost-plus-incentive model. On March 15, Winter declared that unless a “meeting of the minds” on a new contract could be reached, the Navy would cancel construction. On April 12, he made good on that threat.

Item:  Army’s Future Combat System Budget Woes Continue —  At $161 billion, the Future Combat Systems is the Pentagon’s second-most-costly program, behind the $276 billion Joint Strike Fighter.   Since fiscal 2003, the program’s research and development phase has slipped five years and the final fielding date by seven years.

…and the list goes on…

As has been pointed out and advocated elsewhere, the time has long since come and passed when the sacrificial O-6 PIM was unceremoniously tossed off the pyramid after having his heart removed.  It has passed even for the very public execution of one- or twos-stars.  No, the time is now for the very public firing of senior government civilians.  It is also time to fire industry as well, and dare it be said, buy foreign.  Yes, you read that right, the time has come to buy foreign.

It has become painfully obvious that the post-Cold War "consolidation" of the defense industry has not served the best interests of the country in terms of efficiency or stated mission – providing for the common defense.  Instead, virtual monopolies exist with a "whattaya gonna do, go overseas to buy ‘X’ capability?" attitude.  How else does one explain the enduring morass that is the American shipbuilding industry.  The same industry that just lost out to a Spanish shipbuilder for Australia’s new AEGIS-based destroyer because of cost.  The same one that has totally hosed the LCS (not that that program was the brightest one to begin with) and of course, the current poster child for yard-work ineptitude and gross malfeasance, LPD-17. 

And over on the aviation side?  Besides the A-12 turkey, there are a legion of developmentally delayed, over-budget programs.  Even something as straightforward as an air-launched cruise missile can’t seem to make it in under budget (shoot, even on budget and on time) despite the fact that GPS and reliable cruise missile technologies and fuzing have been around for a long time now.

The American public was faced with a similar set of circumstances in the mid-70s and for a decade, the American automobile industry just did not "get it."  Dollars flowed to Toyota, Honda, Mazda and Datsun instead of Ford, GM, Dodge and American.  Some disappeared from the landscape and the remainder continue in the fight of their corporate lives in what remains a very tenuous existence.

Now, your ‘umble correspondent is sanguine enough to realize that with most all of the Legislative and a healthy portion of the Executive branches in their pockets, the defense industry won’t find itself in the same straits as their civilian counterparts up in Detroit.  But, you know, maybe they need to be notched down a couple of steps.  Maybe JASSM should be canceled and SecDef announce that we are buying EADS’ Storm Shadow or Bofors’ TAURUS instead because we seem incapable of producing a reliable air-launched tactical cruise missile.  Maybe SecNav scraps the LCS idea and says we are buying an entire class of corvettes because our ship-building industry is incapable of designing and producing a new class of reduced signature combatants for a brown water mission.  Maybe, well, you get the picture.

Of course the likelihood of something like this coming to pass is nil, but one can still dream…

Similar Posts

7 Comments

  1. I do understand exactly what “government contracts” really mean, but I do NOT accept that attitude when it comes to our defence…most especially not at the present time in the state of the world’s affairs. Things are so out of hand, that it’ s obvious that only by canceling contracts and bringing charges against those companies/inidviduals responsible for years of hindering our defence capabilities and endangering the lives of our active-duty Military will anything change. During a time of war, this is more than a scandal…it is criminal.

    Veritas et Fidelis Semper

  2. Maybe it’s just time to go back to the old system of government-run arsenals and shipyards rather than private contractors.

  3. I’m not so sure reverting to govt-run arsenals/shipyards is such a good idea as well — IIRC, the scandal over the (non) performance of US torpedos in the early years of WW2 was traced directly back to BuOrd and the navy’s topedo factory at Newport. Don’t get me wrong – the private sector has its share of scandalous practices, past and present. It also has been the source of innovation and advances that lept ahead of government run organizations. Were it not for the private sector taking risk upon themselves, we might have been left in the lurch. Case in point, the F4F Wildcat was developed/refined on Grumman’s dime after losnig the competition to the Brewster Buffalo. The Navy was sufficiently impressed with the result that they ordered a small production run that was increased as we ended up going to war. It also set in motion the wheels for the Wildcat’s succesor – the F6F Hellcat…
    – SJS

  4. I worked on the forerunner to JASSM back in the late 80’s!!! That was a replacement for the MLRS and that never made it. Same concept, same CONTRACTOR too and they still can’t get it right.

    Earlier in my career I used to be a part of these teams that “hammered” projects. I did the software systems and despite very good MIL-STD, CMM/SEI and IEEE standards and guides it was still screwed up.

    As for foreign, it’ll never happen. For two reasons, the services will scream SECURITY!!! The Senators/Representatives will scream RE-ELECTION!

    Ed
    (former RASN guy)

  5. Moving towards foreign suppliers has already begun, what with the selection of Agusta Westland’s EH101 as the new Marine One, not to mention the 9mm pistols we’re equipping the troops with these days. I was shocked at the Marine One decision, personally. But you make a powerful point, SJS.

    If I were in contracting/procurement and selected a foreign supplier for any “major” program I’d make danged sure I had a hellaciously large inventory of every conceivable spare part and all sub-systems on hand and staged globally…just in case the balloon really went up. Which would drive up costs considerably, IMHO.

  6. We’ve had some dependence on foreign suppliers for years. When they closed down Boston Naval Shipyard the need for quality anchor chain didn’t disappear. It did make for another good reason to keep those North Atlantic SLOCs open. I agree somewhat with Trimegistus – some of those depots and yards were closed in a bit too much hurry. Keeping things on hand can be important.

Comments are closed.